It isn't necessary, because we should know what these big corporations and news stations already know. The citizens of a nation need to stay informed and thus come to trust the media that brings the news and information they desire without fear that it is a lie, an agency of an evil foreign power or in any other way not the closest to the truth possible. Something needs to be done about this. Censorship is also necessary to protect the young from the hordes of violent and sexual content found on the media. With powerful organizations limiting information 1.
In reality, the notion of freedom of speech we uphold faithfully does not benefit the interests of the masses, but only for the interest of the owners and operators of the media industry. I am a firm believer in picking my battles over issues that have little significance in the big picture but there is one area that I put my foot down and that is being kind to others. There are many battles to be won, but we will battle them together—all of us. Con I agree with your statement about how certain things may deserve to be censored, however, most of the time censorship does not actually account for these factors. When The New York Times published these U. Pros and Cons of Censorship.
It is because children are frequently exposed to the media such as television and internet. People around the world react to censorship differently due to the country they live in. Some censorship is permissible in order to protect children. In fact, this freedom of expression that music allows us is one of the primary reasons why it exists. Since there is freedom of speech for them on social media, these teenagers will be able to freely express their opinion without any concern This freedom of speech, however, is a double edged sword that may be misused by these teenagers. I don't think there is any exact, perfect answer.
That being said, I find it difficult to give my full trust to any news or report on an event , let alone base my beliefs off of something that was skewed so much that it became a whole different story or subject in itself. Not everyone wants to hear profanities everywhere and see nude bodies in magazines. If you want to change the levels of censorship in our society--in other words, to benefit society by loosening or tightening censorship--the best approach is to appeal to the stated values of our institutions. Censorship is good only if used correctly either for children or adults. This calls for media censorship. Instead it should be directed and controlled by parents with or without children. From fake products to tall claims, people are misled into believing what is evidently not true.
Censorship of the media for children is necessary, but should not be handled by government or other groups. Instead of broadcasting the explicit version on cable television, an edited and censored version is shown instead. Con Censorship has become a serious issue, and not only in the media. Censorship of art and books should not be enforced because it intrudes on the rights of a person. Young children may not be able to discern reality from the virtual world and they may be influenced by the violent content. This issue is everyone's problem. Reporting a story is news when all the verifiable facts are told, but when they report a story but fail to verify it then it is just spin.
Even though many might argue that censorship doesn't really have a place in a society that emphases freedom of speech and the freedom to express oneself, but censorship is an essential and needed part of our growing society, it's needed in the television industry, the Internet, and the music industry. These institutions offer benefits to their members but also constraints and a narrow range of choices of expression. With the advent of new media, the dissemination of information has reached an unparalleled scale, bringing to the fore the inevitable reality of censorship. But what is questionable is that is media makers or content creators to be blamed? In these times the idea of censorship was viewed differently that it is today. If nothing is censored, who knows what will be said out of the radio, television, news, etc, and anything that is supposed to be said can cause war between medias or even countries.
Television and movie ratings have become more lenient against violence and indiscretion because these things are now seen as entertainment. On terrestrial radio, censorship makes sure that any music being played is a clean version of the song. Con Well that's a whole different debate in itself since that deals with libel and the first amendment. While are often edited for length, there are many subjective choices that are made which are designed to keep some information from becoming public. Sex, especially porn, sometimes illustrates a lot of unnatural and at times disturbing videos. I censor the media by not watching it.
Ask yourself: would I feel the same should the color of my skin, religion, or nationality be any different? Howard Stern and the Future of Media Censorship. However, computer-mediated communication in the web can claim unequivocal democratic merits only for a special context: It can undermine the censorship of authoritarian regimes that try to control and repress public opinion. On a bright side, this technological development in the media industry empowers the individuals but on a dark side, the technological empowerment is abused as individuals are not held accountable for biased and defaming remarks. On the one hand, censorship is very important… occurred in the regulation of content of American movies, signaling the collapse of governmental censorship. Constitution in regard to freedom of the press because presently the media is doing more harm than good. That is what they are doing with the presidential election. Types of Censorship: Almost everything at some point could be placed underneath a category of censorship.