Animals do not willingly sacrifice themselves for the advancement of human welfare and new technology. Also, if the number of animals used in the experiment is reduced, the number of animals harmed during experimentation would also be reduced. Do the pros outweigh the cons of animal testing? The drug was withdrawn in 1961 and 1968 after a long campaign. Other than mice, rats, rabbits, and guinea pigs, the lengthy list of animals used in research labs also includes fruit flies, frogs, cats, dogs, pigs and non-human primates. Those against the practice argue that animals, pretty much like us humans, have the right to live, and we need to accept that instead of killing them with the intention of improving our quality of life. Furthermore, the Draize test has become practically obsolete because of the development of a synthetic cellular tissue that closely resembles human skin.
Take a stand to end animal testing by using alternative methods and boycotting animal tested products. Certain Amount Of Benefits To The Animals Whenever a test on an animal is successful, the animal reaps the rewards of this. Unlike the farms and feedlots that we often see while driving through the countryside, animal research and breeding facilities are much more hidden from view. Computers have also been used to simulate and estimate the potential damage that a product or chemical can cause, and human tissues and cells have been used to examine the effects of harmful substances. To ensure an absolute cruelty-free cosmetics collection, always look out for the signature cruelty-free bunny logo.
However, there are scientists who back animal testing for cosmetics. Europe, for example, has banned the sale of cosmetics with. Testing on monkeys at 500 times the dose given to the volunteers totally failed to predict the dangerous side effects. The science relating to animal experiments can be extremely complicated and views often differ. Others respond that animals themselves benefit from animal research. However individuals perceive animals, the fact remains that animals are being exploited by research facilities and cosmetics companies all across the country and all around the world.
One Green Plant, 13 May 2014. The study estimated that 17 million to 100 million animals are still used in laboratories. Even though animal testing may tell us how the use of these products may affect humans, the testing process itself causes excess harm to people and the environment. This is a government website, and thus, the information is reliable. But we can't assume what works in animals will in humans. The foremost argument against animal testing questions the ethics of this practice in which millions of animals are harmed, if not killed, in the name of research.
A mouse may react positively to a treatment while a bird may have a negative reaction. This could force many companies to try and find alternatives, putting us one step closer to making animal testing a thing of the past. Therefore animals are being senselessly hurt, and humans are also suffering serious consequences. Included in this article is a brief overview of the pros and cons of animal testing, two short animal experimentation videos, and an infographic about animal testing and cosmetics. Marla Winstead Blogspot, 5 November 2012. Heart Views: The Official Journal of the Gulf Heart Association, 12 1 , 42.
For example, regulatory tests for botox, vaccines and some tests for chemical safety are essentially variations of the cruel Lethal Dose 50 test in which 50% of the animals die or are killed very close to death. Animals are used in order to ensure the products are safe for the use of humans. Mice and rats are empathetic and studies have shown that they will risk themselves to rescue cage-mates in captivity. In recent years, the practice of using animals for biomedical research has come under severe criticism by animal protection and animal rights groups. This test is extremely painful to the animals because death can take days or even weeks. So if these significant differences exist, why continue to this useless practice? Making human's lives better should not be justification for torturing and exploiting animals. Animal experimentation up 73 percent, study says.
In the Name of Science: Issues in Responsible Animal Experimentation. As of April of this year, there are many companies who still test on animals. It had been tested on animals first. What about trends over time? If scientists were to use a milder dose of the product or give a pain reliever during the procedure, this would reduce the pain and stress an animal endures during the procedure and could produce better, more accurate results. The Animal Welfare Act of 1966, the federal law which regulates the treatment of animals for the purpose of research and exhibition, has been heavily criticized as it offers no protection to mice, rats, birds, frogs, etc. Still not sure what credible articles might look like? Other animals, such as monkeys, more often come from international suppliers that operate in Southeast Asia, parts of Africa, and China.
To learn more, visit the and websites. Debates on the ethics of animal testing have raged since the seventeenth century. Animal testing is one of those topics that can polarize opinions. Yes, many of these times the animal is inflicted with the condition on purpose, but once a cure or treatment is found they receive it. Speak up for animals suffering in laboratories around the world.